This one has 474 words. Better skip it.

One of the most flattering accusations that I’ve encountered to date is that of intellectual snobbery. I know and use words that people don’t and have often not even heard. E.g. cruciverbalism, the creation of crosswords (don’t ask). I refer to books or facts that others haven’t a clue about. I quote dead people. Terrible state of affairs, that. So since I’m not going to escape the majority view of being a smarty-pants, here I confess:
As of Sunday evening, I’m hooked on to a live Economist debate.
The topic is mass intelligence. Or as the website puts it “This house believes that in its appetite for culture, the world is wising up more than it is dumbing down.” A scholar, Susan Jacoby, and an editor, Tim de Lisle, take sides and readers are invited to join in. I’ve read both sides, their rebuttals and those of the moderator as well, and I must say, I’ve not got this much food for thought in quite a while.
Which is why I feel compelled to regurgitate (whoops, there I go again) some of that food over here. (The previous entries are shorter, simpler and less thought provoking, if you’d rather not be bothered):
Tim de Lisle speaks of technology as a hero, talking about how convenient it has made creativity. Photography, videos, gaming, online texts and blogging are all the modern avatars of art and literature, and hence culture, to him. To Susan Jacoby, the web has drastically reduced the attention span of youngsters, seducing them away from the reading habit.
Perennial fence-sitter that I am, I can’t help but see the point in both these sides. But I’m siding with Ms. Jacoby on this one. See, I admit that people have never clicked, recorded or typed quite so much before. But how much of that is art and how much is pure self-indulgence (like this little piece) is a matter of opinion. I do mourn the death of reading anything more than 200 words at a go. 10, in advertising, if you’re feeling particularly verbose. And yes, the average 20-year-old now truly has the attention span of a particularly dull goldfish (Brother dearest being a classic example), while at the same time having absolutely no clue what the hell Michelangelo did to Sistine Chapel, whoever she is. And because that really isn’t enough, we in India have proposals to make Maths optional, to simplify syllabus so that all students can pass, and of course, why not, do away with all examinations till the 7th standard. Yes, we’re really getting on the smart bus now.
My point is that the internet has made life simpler, fostered creativity and in general given us many more options regarding what to do with our time. But we all know how much of that time is spent on Facebook and how much in reading an Economist debate.

5 thoughts on “This one has 474 words. Better skip it.

  1. “But we all know how much of that time is spent on Facebook and how much in reading an Economist debate.”Haha 😀And F.Y.I:I did read all of the 474 words…not just the last line 🙂


  2. what madam, you are just giving the notification that not understanding your hif-fi english most peoples. i am also the talking englsih just as super duper as you also. if i am really use the calibre you will need dictionary. so please refrain from gesticulating (check dictionay already) and the fabricating of the masticatyions of the cranial postulations only.


  3. Vidya, thank you for doing that 🙂What Anonymous, why you taking post by myself all personal-personal? I am confident that you speaking better english than poor myself. Please to excuse and kindly to keep reading in future also.


  4. Your post reminded me of David Duchovny’s LOL rant on Californication. Here’s the clip in case you haven’t seen it: sounds almost absurd, but I think I’ve already turned into those adults who go about saying things like ‘Kids were smarter in our time.’ It does seem like that though, especially when ‘I cum acrs ppl who typ lyk dis’. Add to this a dumbed-down education system and you get, well, Americans. I came across your blog just a little while ago and I quite like it.


Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s